Data & Digitization: American Panorama
Chapters two and three expounded such topics as data collection, methods of classification, bias, ethical considerations, and creating a medium through which to present over the internet including concepts that one should be familiar with if they are to create a DH project.
The way data are collected and the process by which they are
sorted and either discarded or retained should follow from calculated thought
that seeks to protect what the data define. A digital humanities project, like
research, should take utmost care in treating its data’s referents.
As a creator, you define what a data point is, how it will be
organized with others, and what possible data points not to mention, that may
be related. Once your data is collected and organized, you present it. To whom
you present and how both determine your course of action – which platform,
modality, and the exact amount of information.
Potential questions to ask about your presentation choices
might be: “Are these choices good for the long term? How satisfactory is this
presentation for the average person in fulfilling needs, and is it also accessible
to people with specific needs? Can other people freely use this information,
and have I controlled for the factors that may complicate privacy issues when
sharing?
Here I take a preliminary look at the project I’ll be
analyzing, indeed quite a comprehensive one, the "American Panorama" project by
the Digital Scholarship Lab at the University of Richmond. This project is
centered around maps modeling data with historical significance in the US.
The most overt digitization is the representation of
pre-internet data such as photos, sums of money, locations, dates, distances,
displacements, etc. The project seeks to tell U.S. history with the aid of
maps, and it succeeds because of using thorough techniques of presenting
analysis paired with texts telling the story of the various visualizations, like
the interactive map and accompanying scrollable text on the right in this photo.
The site is also easily navigable, interesting to look at, and
up to date. Moreover, the sources of funding for this project bring me to presume
that privacy matters were just in its making. The comprehensive ten maps of
this project aside, the creators are looking to add more, and have linked
another work of theirs – The Atlas of the Historical Geography of the United States
– within the site.

You raise some good questions. Accessibility and ethical considerations are clearly important too!
ReplyDelete